> Le 26 janv. 2015 à 10:09, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> a écrit : > > > > Am 26.01.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: >> On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Joseph Tam wrote: >>> St?phane Cottin writes: >> >>>> dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose >>>> email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead >>>> ( see my previous post for details ). >> >>> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >>> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >>> issue a bounce Email to the sender. >> >> which would be OK, if "never loose email contents" means "no message is >> discarded silently". > > no, it is not OK to backscatter because the spamfilter fails > > realize that 99% auf junk is using forged senders > > recently i got each day some hundret such bounces from mailservers configured > by fools reply to spam with forged senders and if i could i would have gone > out for beat every responsible admin straight in the face >
I may discard emails based on RBLs, but I don't want to discard emails based on statistical fllters, I prefer deliver them in the Junk folder and let the user have a chance to reclassify using dovecot_antispam. And yes, bounce spams to (forged or not) sender is useless.
