On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:
On 19.11.2013, at 22.36, Stephan Bosch <step...@rename-it.nl> wrote:
>
>
>> On 11/19/2013 8:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 17.11.2013, at 0.21, Mike Selner @ Yahoo <msel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> They can add a different :handle parameter to get a different response, but
>>> .. as I understand it, a different vacation reason message should also
>>> trigger a separate vacation notice, but looks like Pigeonhole doesn’t
>>> currently do that. Stephan?
>>
>> It should though. It implements the behavior recommended in the RFC
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230#section-4.2); i.e., generate a
>> handle from the provided arguments (ignoring variables!) if none is
>> provided explicitly. This is performed here:
>>
>> http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/file/b7434a02fc51/src/lib-sieve/plugins/vacation/cmd-vacation.c#l471
>>
>> So did you test this unsuccessfully or did you have problems finding it
>> in the sources? If it doesn't work it would obviously be a bug. The
>> constructed handle value can be seen by dumping the Sieve script binary
>> with sieve-dump.
>
>Oh, I just didn’t look into the correct place in the code. I didn’t think that
>handle would be generated before ext_vacation_operation_execute(). So answer
>to Mike: Just have them change the reason string in some way.
>
>Thank you! That did the trick. If they change the vacation message it will
>send an auto- response even if it had previously responded to the same person.
Mike
