On 19.11.2013, at 22.36, Stephan Bosch <step...@rename-it.nl> wrote: > On 11/19/2013 8:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 17.11.2013, at 0.21, Mike Selner @ Yahoo <msel...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> They can add a different :handle parameter to get a different response, but >> .. as I understand it, a different vacation reason message should also >> trigger a separate vacation notice, but looks like Pigeonhole doesn’t >> currently do that. Stephan? > > It should though. It implements the behavior recommended in the RFC > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230#section-4.2); i.e., generate a > handle from the provided arguments (ignoring variables!) if none is > provided explicitly. This is performed here: > > http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/file/b7434a02fc51/src/lib-sieve/plugins/vacation/cmd-vacation.c#l471 > > So did you test this unsuccessfully or did you have problems finding it > in the sources? If it doesn't work it would obviously be a bug. The > constructed handle value can be seen by dumping the Sieve script binary > with sieve-dump.
Oh, I just didn’t look into the correct place in the code. I didn’t think that handle would be generated before ext_vacation_operation_execute(). So answer to Mike: Just have them change the reason string in some way.
