Quoting Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmail.fm>:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, at 06:23 AM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
No. RFC 5819 [2]:
"For each selectable mailbox matching the list pattern and selection
options, the server MUST return an untagged LIST response followed by
an untagged STATUS response containing the information requested in
the STATUS return option."
Just wondering if the INBOX was SELECTed at the time? There's some fun
interaction around STATUS and SELECT in RFC3501.
Except as I read 5819, this is completely irrelevant. LIST-STATUS !=
STATUS. LIST-STATUS produces STATUS-like responses, but isn't
controlled by any of the rules of the original STATUS. At least
that's how I interpret it.
Looking at the rest of this thread, I think we are all in agreement
that something is fishy. As OP reported, it appears to be something
specific with personal namespaces (possibly 'INBOX.' only).
michael
