* Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> 2013.08.06 19:42:

> The idea behind quota_grace is that the last mail would be allowed to take 
> the user somewhat over quota (e.g. up to 109% quota usage). On the next mail 
> delivery user is already over quota, so the size of the mail is irrelevant 
> because a mail of any size will be rejected. The initial quota-status 
> implementation didn't even support SIZE extension since I didn't remember it 
> existed.

I'm referring to the Postfix side _only_ or the initial SMTP Handshake if you 
like. My point is that there is no safe way to reject mails at this level *if* 
the remote server doesn't play nice. I think this was the whole point of 
writing a policy service for Postfix. I'm not *talking* about quotas that will 
be handled  by the delivery agents...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to