Le 07/08/2012 16:57, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On 7.8.2012, at 15.54, to...@starbridge.org wrote:
#0 settings_parser_dup (old_ctx=0xa26920, new_pool=0x6d6f632e32) at
settings-parser.c:1742
new_ctx = <optimized out>
iter = <optimized out>
new_link = <optimized out>
links = <optimized out>
key = <optimized out>
value = <optimized out>
i = <optimized out>
parser_pool = <optimized out>
__FUNCTION__ = "settings_parser_dup"
#1 0x00007fc7a77c3ecc in cache_add (parser=0xa26920, output=0x7ffffe4557f0,
input=0x7ffffe455790, cache=0x60ea50)
at master-service-settings-cache.c:221
entry = 0xe98b90
pool = 0xe98b70
pool_size = <optimized out>
entry_local_name = 0xe98b90 "pop.te.com"
I guess nobody had tried to run Dovecot with many local / remote {} blocks
previously. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/2815175a0ffc
Thanks Timo
I will give it a try ASAP, but is it a bad thing to run dovecot with
many local {} ?
Thanks again for your work !
Regards
Tonio
