On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 16:04 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote: > > The gotcha is that you have two completely independent quotas with > > independent usage/limits for the INBOX and Archive namespaces. If that > > is what you want, it should all be fine. > > Nope, that's totally fine. The idea is to put Archive on cheaper > (slower) storage and then grant more generous quotas there to make it > worth their while to use, without slowing down their Inbox. Another > application would be to put their Spam in another namespace (for > people who choose to have it put in a separate folder) with a lower > quota, again to offload it onto cheaper storage, since hardly anyone > actually looks at it.
Should be fine then. > Or is this something that I could be doing more transparently in 2.1 with > imapc? I don't really see how that could help.
