On 2010-06-15 4:05 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote: > I prefer "don't fix if it isn't broken" philosophy.
I also subscribe to that philosophy, but there are limits. Keeping current makes sure you take advantage of possibly unknown bugfixes and/or security holes, and also means when asking for help you won't get responses like 'that's already fixed in the current stable version', not to mention (sometimes considerable) performance improvements - at least in the case of dovecot. Security is the main reason I like to stay on current stable versions for software I use though. > I don't see that 1.2 is stable enought from what I have read from this > list and Changelog. There have been lots of bugfixes during last year > for 1.2 branch. It is stable. There were a lot of bugfixes to the 1.1 branch too... most of which are corner cases that most people will never encounter anyway. On more than one occasion I have seen Timo say he won't fix some particular problem in older versions because it is already fixed in current stable version, etc... No software is bug free - thankfully, Timo is like 'The Flash' when it comes to fixing bugs with dovecot... > From reading changelog (http://www.dovecot.org/doc/NEWS), I did not find > functional improvement to justify switching to 1.2 instead of keeping > really stable 1.1. Again - 1.2 is the current stable branch. Luckily for you though, there are no laws requiring anyone to use any particular version of any particular piece of software... ;) -- Best regards, Charles
