Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: >>>>> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right? >>>> That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"? >>>> >>>> "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ... >>>> just not >>>> right at all. >>> dovetail >> +1 > > Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free > of pornographic associations either. :) > > So my last idea: doveless. "It's less of a dovecot process." To me it > seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far.
I don't remember if 'dove-nil', 'dovenil' or 'dovenull' were suggested by anyone. If not please consider them. Kind regards, Marco -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | mnen...@prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia | --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95 5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
