Eric Rostetter put forth on 2/24/2010 9:13 PM: > Quoting Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com>: > >> I guess you didn't have enough (any?) people testing mbox body search >> before >> the v1.2 release. Is everyone but me using maildir? Makes me wish I >> had an >> extra box so I could do dovecot devel version testing against mbox. > > I'm running mbox with 1.2 and not seeing any problems... But that may be > because I threw a lot of hardware at it?
Hi Eric. Not sure if even fast hardware searching 11,000+ message count mbox'en without an FTS plugin would give speedy results, given Timo's discovery of earlier today. Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/24/2010 12:27 PM: > Looks like there's something very wrong with mbox with v1.2+. It's doing > a *lot* of message header parsing work that doesn't happen with v1.1 or > with other mailbox formats. Probably because I fixed some bugs where it > was wrongly caching some state, but now it's not caching it long enough. -- Stan
