On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 01:21 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Stan Hoeppner put forth on 2/24/2010 12:17 AM: > > Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/23/2010 11:06 PM: > > >> No, body searches aren't indexed (without fts plugins). > > I wish you'd have mentioned the Squat plugin earlier Timo. I feel I've made > a fool of myself. I just setup squat and after a long first search on that > 50MB, 11K+ messages mbox file, every search after the first has taken less > than 5 seconds, most only 2 seconds. It's performing exactly as I'd like. > It's amazing.
Well, when index is up-to-date it's fast. But after you've received a few mails, at least with me it seemed to spend more time updating the index than just doing the regular search. > I didn't ever setup any fts plugins on 1.0.15. I'm left wondering how body > searches were so fast if I didn't have an fts plugin configured. Looks like there's something very wrong with mbox with v1.2+. It's doing a *lot* of message header parsing work that doesn't happen with v1.1 or with other mailbox formats. Probably because I fixed some bugs where it was wrongly caching some state, but now it's not caching it long enough.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
