On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 18:18 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:54 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > If every attachment in a given message is individually scanned to > > generate some unique identifier, and that identifier then used to > > determine whether or not it exists in the database - this could have > > HUGE effects. This now addresses not just the simple broadcast - but > > some really crazy possibilities. > > Oh BTW. I think dbmail 2.3 does that. Then again I haven't yet seen a > stable dbmail version. But looks like they've released 2.3.6 recently > that I haven't tested yet.
Tested again. Still crashes in the middle of imaptest runs. And imaptest now reports more bugs than last time I tried.. Archiveopteryx probably does SIS and works better.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
