Op 04/08/2009 om 11:15:39 +0200, schreef Stephan Bosch:
> Leo Baltus wrote:
>> Op 04/08/2009 om 10:46:59 +0200, schreef Stephan Bosch:
>>> Leo Baltus wrote:
>>>> Hi Stephan,
>>>>
>>>> I would very much like to start using sieve as a procmail replacement.
>>>> The lack of date handling in sieve is holding me from doing so.
>>>>
>>>> I think you are aware of rfc5260, may I suggest it as a feature request?
>>> No need, since it is on my list. I can bump up priority, as it does
>>> not depend on other extensions or new infrastructure in the Sieve
>>> engine. Still, it is not trivial to implement.
>>>
>> That would be great.
>>
> What exactly would you like to do with this? I am asking to make sure
> that there are no other features needed, like for instance the index
> extension mentioned in RFC5260. That would definitely need changes in
> the Sieve engine.
>
I haven't looked at indexes, just basic archiving would be nice:
from the rfc (I hope this is valid syntax):
if currentdate :matches "month" "*" { set "month" "${1}"; }
if currentdate :matches "year" "*" { set "year" "${1}"; }
# archive all
fileinto :copy "mail-${year}${month}";
# my favorite list
if header :contains ["To", "Cc"]
[ "dovecot@dovecot.org", "dovecot-n...@dovecot.org" ]
{
fileinto "dovecot-${year}${month}";
stop;
}
--
Leo Baltus, internetbeheerder /\
NPO ICT Internet Services /NPO/\
Sumatralaan 45, 1217 GP Hilversum, Filmcentrum, west \ /\/
beh...@omroep.nl, 035-6773555 \/
