At 06:39 PM 5/27/2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
If you don't necessarily need load-balancing to multiple servers, it should be faster and more reliable to use active/passive and some (automated) failover between them. If you use active/active servers, you either need some clustered filesystem (not that efficient) or NFS (kind of sucks too).
Is active/passive a dovecot configuration option? Rick
