On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Luke Meyer wrote:
1) Email us and say "hey, this bit is wrong".

BTW, I never got any response (not even a "patches welcome") to my first email 
on this list suggesting some changes (5/13).


I'm very sorry. I can only say that either we were distracted, or, more likely, 
in this case, nobody was 100% certain what to make of the patch. I, for one, 
have never even considered using ProxyPassMatch inside a LocationMatch. Is 
there a reason that you'd not just use a single ProxyPassMatch that 
incorporated both patterns? I presume there's a use case for this, but it seems 
that it would add an unwanted additional layer of complexity. Is this something 
we want to encourage by documenting it?

You would use ProxyPassMatch inside a LocationMatch because you want to proxy 
inside a LocationMatch and ProxyPass doesn't do it as expected. There aren't 
two patterns being matched, only one - the pattern from LocationMatch is used 
for the inner ProxyPassMatch pattern just like a Location path would be used 
for an inner ProxyPass. I spent some time testing to figure this out for a 
customer - just thought others could benefit. Improvements to my wording are of 
course appreciated.

2) Submit an actual patch to the mailing list
3) Open a ticket in bugzilla.

Perhaps this would be a good time to point out I have a suggested patch at 
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50048 if someone wouldn't 
mind applying it :-)


Attempted to apply, but it failed to apply. I'll need to go through and attempt 
to manually apply when I have a little more time.

Hm - that's a bummer. Maybe it's because the patch is against trunk, while the 
bug links are to 2.2. I should probably create the patch against 2.2 as well...

I'm very sorry that we ignored you. I'm paying more attention now that I was 
back in May.


BTW, my 5/13 query was about something else entirely (perhaps I'll create a 
bug). I probably came across as kvetching just now, which wasn't my intent - 
it's just context for the discussion of creating an environment that encourages 
contribution.

Reply via email to