On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Luke Meyer wrote:
1) Email us and say "hey, this bit is wrong".
BTW, I never got any response (not even a "patches welcome") to my
first email on this list suggesting some changes (5/13).
I'm very sorry. I can only say that either we were distracted, or,
more likely, in this case, nobody was 100% certain what to make of the
patch. I, for one, have never even considered using ProxyPassMatch
inside a LocationMatch. Is there a reason that you'd not just use a
single ProxyPassMatch that incorporated both patterns? I presume
there's a use case for this, but it seems that it would add an
unwanted additional layer of complexity. Is this something we want to
encourage by documenting it?
2) Submit an actual patch to the mailing list
3) Open a ticket in bugzilla.
Perhaps this would be a good time to point out I have a suggested
patch at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50048 if
someone wouldn't mind applying it :-)
Attempted to apply, but it failed to apply. I'll need to go through
and attempt to manually apply when I have a little more time.
I'm very sorry that we ignored you. I'm paying more attention now that
I was back in May.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
