* Vincent Bray wrote:
> On 23/07/07, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Vincent Bray wrote: > > > It doesn't make the merge any easier (that often works fine with two > > > separate WCs like "svn merge -r99:100 ../httpd-trunk .") but it would > > > allow for a single commit rather than two or three (hence making it > > > more likely that 2.0 would get fixes). > > > > FWIW, I personally like it to see 3 commits, for easier oversight > > and "think-before-you-type" reasons. > > However, I do prefer separate xml and html commits, too :-) > > Does that avoid the issue of trailing meta data? At the moment I'll > fiddle the xml, build the html version, commit both. Then the next > cycle gets a bunch of build detritus because of the new revision > number from the previous commit. You would have a separation between edited and generated data. So looked at it that way - yes. nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
