On 23/07/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/23/07, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any objections to this before I backport it for 2.x? It follows from
> this thread:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ywy6lt
Got to it.
Will do.
Regarding svn commit messages.. Clearly the dev@ guys have a
prescribed formula for theirs but docs@ doesn't (as far as I can see).
When backporting, is it better to have e.g. "Backport r273654 to 2.2"
or the same message as the original commit?
It's a shame there isn't a cleaner way to apply patches to multiple
branches simultaneously. I guess if there were, it'd be more likely
that relevant changes would be kept in sync (for 2.0 in particular).
The simple solution would be to checkout at a higher level that
included trunk and the relevant branches but I'm not aware of a way to
do that which wouldn't also give all the tags and specialised
branches. Any clues?
--
noodl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
