Andre, I am sorry for any confusion on this matter. OSoft never asked to have our format as the official Apache Documentation. That would be quite naive. Apache has an incredible documentation group and we have no intent to interfere. All I asked is if we could be listed as an alternative format for those people who wish to have all of their documentation in one format, viewable offline. For example, MySQL offers their documentation in HTML, .PDF, CHM, and ThoutReader™ formats.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 8:37 AM To: docs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Apache Documentation available in ThoutReader format] * "Mark D. Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you kindly help me interpret this message below? You've missed to quote most of the important stuff ;-) > The ThoutReaderT is an open source GPL project. We are in the process of > converting all available OS documentation into one common format and > distributing it free. It is not clear to me what the issues are. There are no issues. You have taken the docs and converted it. No, we won't pick your format as official Apache documentation format, but you are free to provide it for download (of course). Note that the apache feather is an ASF trademark only to be used with permission. Further points include: - Apache doc is no OS documentation - We don't use docbook (as you might think?!) nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
