toki wrote: > On 21/01/2016 23:26, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >> Actually that is incorrect. > > You're not looking at psycho-demographic groups, based upon their > preferred formats for receiving new data. > > What the documentation states it is focused upon means squat. > >> but if you are not willing or able to step forward and volunteer to ta > ke a crack at getting it working than all one is > > The quandary is that everything outlined being contrary to The Apache Wa > y. > > How justifiable is it to totally smash The Apache Way to smithereens, to > accomplish the desired goal --- documentation that is current, and > supports marketing AOO to students, individuals, and the corporate world > ? > How justifiable is it to disparage what is currently going on when doing nothing to alleviate the problem. You present yourself as someone who has the editing skills to help alleviate the problem, but I see no evidence that you have done anything to improve the process or the documentation itself except occasionally pontificate on the list and taking no concrete action to help in anyway.
When you want to constructively participate by mentoring volunteers or editing documentation or even writing or editing existing high level documents that can be used to improve the product we are trying to develop then we can continue this fascinating conversation. Regards Keith > jonathon >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
