On Apr 30, 2025, at 00:03, Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io> wrote: > > Thanks for doing that maintenance. > > I'm not sure if draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify should also be added; > it's a DS provisioning document, but also more general. Just bringing it up > with no preference.
There were other "more general" documents that had a small DNSSEC component that we didn't list in RFC 9364. Having said that, if the WG wants to add a new section to this bis document to mention those types of RFCs, that's fine too. > I think it would be a good idea to list all those DNSSEC docs in a registry, > so we don't have to replace the document regularly. A registry cannot give the context that an RFC has. Further, one of the primary audiences for this work is general technologists, none of whom would think to look for an IANA registry. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
