Hi Paul,

Thanks for doing that maintenance.

I'm not sure if draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify should also be added; it's 
a DS provisioning document, but also more general. Just bringing it up with no 
preference.

I think it would be a good idea to list all those DNSSEC docs in a registry, so 
we don't have to replace the document regularly.

Best,
Peter

PS: Diff: 
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=rfc9364&url2=draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis&difftype=--html


On 4/30/25 04:07, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. At the meeting in Bangkok, someone said that we should start 
thinking about updating RFC 9364, BCP 237, that defines DNSSEC. I've started 
this, but we're in no rush to adopt because there are some drafts in the queue 
that will be added before we're ready to do a full update. See Appendix A for 
the list of things already updated, and what's to come.

--Paul Hoffman


Begin forwarded message:

*From: *<internet-dra...@ietf.org>
*Subject: **[Ext] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis-00.txt*
*Date: *April 29, 2025 at 19:02:32 PDT
*To: *Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org>

A new version of Internet-Draft draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Paul Hoffman and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:     draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis
Revision: 00
Title:    DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)
Date:     2025-04-29
Group:    Individual Submission
Pages:    12
URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis-00.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis/
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hoffman-rfc9364bis


Abstract:

  This document describes the DNS Security Extensions (commonly called
  "DNSSEC") that are specified in RFCs 4033, 4034, and 4035, as well as
  a handful of others.  One purpose is to introduce all of the RFCs in
  one place so that the reader can understand the many aspects of
  DNSSEC.  This document does not update any of those RFCs.  A second
  purpose is to state that using DNSSEC for origin authentication of
  DNS data is the best current practice.  A third purpose is to provide
  a single reference for other documents that want to refer to DNSSEC.

  This document obsoletes RFC 9364.

  This document is being tracked at 
(https://github.com/paulehoffman/rfc9364bis).


The IETF Secretariat



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

--
Like our community service? 💛
Please consider donating at

https://desec.io/

deSEC e.V.
Möckernstraße 74
10965 Berlin
Germany

Vorstandsvorsitz: Nils Wisiol
Registergericht: AG Berlin (Charlottenburg) VR 37525

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to