On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:04 PM Philip Homburg <pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> >That is correct; it would only work with algorithms that are universally > suppo > >rted. I should have picked 8 --> 13 as the example, not 13 --> 15. > > > >A multi-signer setup would not be admissible unless each signer uses an > algori > >thm that is universally understood -- but not necessarily the same > algorithm. > > > >See Section 2.2 of > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg > >-rules-04.html#name-signer-requirements. > > Then this document should refer to draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg-rules. > This is currently an (expired) individual draft that has not yet been presented at DNSOP. Peter/Duane/Victor - let's chat this week, refresh it, and plan to do that soon. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
