>That is correct; it would only work with algorithms that are universally suppo >rted. I should have picked 8 --> 13 as the example, not 13 --> 15. > >A multi-signer setup would not be admissible unless each signer uses an algori >thm that is universally understood -- but not necessarily the same algorithm. > >See Section 2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg >-rules-04.html#name-signer-requirements.
Then this document should refer to draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg-rules. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
