Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-03: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document retires the use of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC. I know ECC-GOST is the mnemonic for value 12, but I think it is confusing since there is another GOST that is also ECC? Maybe say: retures the use of GOST R 34.10-2001 (mnemonic "ECC-GOST") In the Security or Operational considerations, it would be mentioned this was never deployed beyond a few test zones and the Russian NIC? And it should say those using it fall back from DNSSEC to DNS, but that is not a big concern because it never saw any real deployment. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
