Hi Ralph,
On 04/03/2025 17:35, Ralf Weber wrote:
Moin!
On 4 Mar 2025, at 15:38, Yorgos Thessalonikefs wrote:
With that I would like to comment on:
- DNS message size; I don't think we can/should limit that at all. This
will kill the inovation part and/or PQC,
Can you explain how you want to achieve this? Messages send over TCP use a two
byte length field, for every DNS messages as per RFC1035 4.2.2. One of the
motivators for DELEG was to define a new message format that would allow this,
but for the current DNS message I don’t think that is possible, unless I am
missing something.
What I meant, and to use Fujiwara's terms to be more precise, is that we
shouldn't hard limit the DNS message size down from the 65K protocol limit.
But I now see how my previous text can be interpreted differently.
Best regards,
-- Yorgos
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
