Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Feb 1, 2025, at 15:49, Robert Edmonds <edmo...@mycre.ws> wrote: > > If comments aren't allowed, what about parens, embedded newlines, \DDD > > and \X escapes, etc.? > > None of that; I'll add more prohibitions. Thanks again for asking good > questions!
OK, so does this imply only names and record data can be represented in this format if they do not contain any values that require escaping? For instance the domain name Action\.domains.ISI.EDU (the SOA RNAME in the zone file example in RFC 1035 Section 5.3) could not be represented with this prohibition? If so it would be good to explicitly document this limitation. (I guess if the value that requires escaping appears in the DUJ Rdata field it could be represented using RFC 3597 syntax, if supported, but not for the DUJ FQDN field.) -- Robert Edmonds _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
