Hello Bob, > I support adoption, and have a few comments.
Thanks! > 3.1. Misconfigurations Causing IP Version Related Name > Space Fragmentation > End of first paragraph: > "As such, these issues are more common for IPv6 > resolution related name space fragmentation." > This sentence will not age well, I suggest dropping it. I tend to agree; There were some voices in various directions on this point, though, so I would appreciate more opinions. No strong feelings about keeping it in, though. > "No A/AAAA records for NS names: > If none of the NS records for a zone in their parent zone have > associated A or AAAA records, while holding the inverse record, > resolution via the concerned IP version is not possible." > Not sure what is meant by "inverse" record - is that a PTR? > Suggestion: > "No A/AAAA records for NS names: > If all of the NS records for a zone in their parent zone have > either > only A records or only AAAA records, then > resolution via the other IP version is not possible." I like the reformulation; Will use it. Inverse indeed meant "A record if only AAAA records are set, or AAAA record if only A records are set" > "Furthermore, any of the misconfigurations above may also materialize > not via a missing Resource Record (RR) but via an RR providing the > IP > address of a nameserver that is not configured to answer queries > via > that IP version [V6DNSRDY-23]." > Suggest " ... not only via a missing Resource Record (RR) but also > via ..." ack > 4.2. Guidelines for DNS Resolvers > > "Every recurisve DNS resolver SHOULD be dual stack." > misspelling of 'recursive' ack Thanks! With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M tob...@fiebig.nl _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
