On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:56 PM IETF Secretariat < ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote:
> > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis in state > Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski) > > The document is available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis/ > > I support adoption, and have a few comments. 3.1. Misconfigurations Causing IP Version Related Name Space Fragmentation End of first paragraph: "As such, these issues are more common for IPv6 resolution related name space fragmentation." This sentence will not age well, I suggest dropping it. "No A/AAAA records for NS names: If none of the NS records for a zone in their parent zone have associated A or AAAA records, while holding the inverse record, resolution via the concerned IP version is not possible." Not sure what is meant by "inverse" record - is that a PTR? Suggestion: "No A/AAAA records for NS names: If all of the NS records for a zone in their parent zone have either only A records or only AAAA records, then resolution via the other IP version is not possible." "Furthermore, any of the misconfigurations above may also materialize not via a missing Resource Record (RR) but via an RR providing the IP address of a nameserver that is not configured to answer queries via that IP version [V6DNSRDY-23]." Suggest " ... not only via a missing Resource Record (RR) but also via ..." 4.2. Guidelines for DNS Resolvers "Every recurisve DNS resolver SHOULD be dual stack." misspelling of 'recursive' -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
