On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 17:39, Peter Thomassen
<peter=40desec...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I support draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis and draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1 
> moving forward.

I also support
>
> I don't know enough about GOST to have an opinion on 
> draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost.
>
How widely deployed is GOST ? do we have data ?

> Best,
> Peter
>
>
> On 1/7/25 03:02, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> >
> > All
> >
> > Welcome back from holidays, those who have returned.
> > Discussions with the working group and authors and we feel these documents 
> > are ready to move forward.  The two deprecation documents are short.
> > The focus of 8624-bis is to move the canonical list of DNSSEC algorithms to
> > an IANA registry.
> >
> > This starts a Working Group Last Call for these three documents:
> >
> >     "DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process"
> >     "Remove SHA-1 from active use within DNSSEC"
> >     "Remove deprecated GOST algorithms from active use within DNSSEC"
> >
> >
> > Current versions of the draft is available here:
> >
> >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/ 
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/>
> >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/ 
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/>
> >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/ 
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/>
> >
> >
> > The Current Intended Status of this document are:
> >
> >     draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis - Informational
> >     draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1 - Proposed Standard
> >     draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost - Proposed Standard
> >
> >
> > Please review the drafts and offer relevant comments.
> >
> > For WGLC, we need positive support and constructive comments; lack of 
> > objection is not enough.
> > So if you think any of these drafts should be published as an RFC, please 
> > say so.
> >
> > If you feel *any* of these documents are *not* ready for publication, 
> > please speak out with your reasons.
> > You are welcome to support or reject any or all of these documents
> >
> > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > tim
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
>
> --
> https://desec.io/
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to