Hi all. [ Meta-comment / email ]
Thank you all for your comments. Wes and I have addressed many of these comments, and posted new (editor) versions in git so you can review the changes, see how they look, confirm we addressed your concerns, etc. [0] DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/blob/master/README.txt Deprecating the use of SHA-1 in DNSSEC signature algorithms: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/blob/main/README.txt Deprecate usage of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-gost/blob/main/README.txt I am also replying to the individual emails to note how we addressed the comments / provide more detail, etc. W [0]: Wes and I disagree on this - I prefer posting new IETF versions with obvious / editorial changes so that people can more easily follow along, whereas Wes prefers no new IETF versions during WGLC. He's bigger (and scarier!) than me, so I agreed to his solution… :-) On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 9:02 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > All > > Welcome back from holidays, those who have returned. > Discussions with the working group and authors and we feel these documents > are ready to move forward. The two deprecation documents are short. > The focus of 8624-bis is to move the canonical list of DNSSEC algorithms > to > an IANA registry. > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for these three documents: > > "DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process" > "Remove SHA-1 from active use within DNSSEC" > "Remove deprecated GOST algorithms from active use within DNSSEC" > > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/ > > > The Current Intended Status of this document are: > > draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis - Informational > draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1 - Proposed Standard > draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost - Proposed Standard > > > Please review the drafts and offer relevant comments. > > For WGLC, we need positive support and constructive comments; lack of > objection is not enough. > So if you think any of these drafts should be published as an RFC, please > say so. > > If you feel *any* of these documents are *not* ready for publication, > please speak out with your reasons. > You are welcome to support or reject any or all of these documents > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: > > thanks > > > tim > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
