On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 21:02:52 -0500 Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All Hello, > Welcome back from holidays, those who have returned. > Discussions with the working group and authors and we feel these > documents are ready to move forward. The two deprecation documents > are short. The focus of 8624-bis is to move the canonical list of > DNSSEC algorithms to an IANA registry. > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for these three documents: > > "DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process" I have not read this, so I won't comment on it. > "Remove SHA-1 from active use within DNSSEC" I wonder why the DNSSEC reference in the "1. Introduction" is mentioning multiple RFC's, while it is only referenced by RFC9364 in the not-ecc-gost. I support the publication of this draft. > "Remove deprecated GOST algorithms from active use within DNSSEC" A small nit on section 2, the last word insecure is written with a capital I, instead of a small letter as in the first paragraph. I support the publication of this draft. -- Stefan Ubbink DNS & Systems Engineer Present: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | ARNHEM | The Netherlands T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 https://www.sidn.nl
pgprQ960BrwCH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
