On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 5:28 PM Jen Linkova <furr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:42 AM Florian Obser <florian+i...@narrans.de> > wrote: > > It occurred to me that a validating stub resolver still needs to know if > > its upstream is messing with DNS. With RFC9606 we can just ask the > > resolver what it's doing, so I put up > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fobser-resinfo-dns64/ > > > > A validating stub can then avoid that resolver or do more fancy things > > like spotting that the resolver did DNS64 synthesis, ignore that answer > > and do its own synthesis using the 8781 prefix... > > Do you think it might be useful to explain those scenarios in the draft? > Because an uneducated reader (like me) might wonder "why does the > resolver need to know" and "what problem does this new feature > solve?". > > P.S. Thank you for posting -01 and removing yet another way to > discover the prefix ;) > YES, thank you for removing that. I also agree with Jen that some further detail about the scenarios would be useful in the draft. I plan to read this more thoroughly, my DNS foo is a bit rusty so I need to look up a few things and read the references. > -- > Cheers, Jen Linkova >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
