On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:42 AM Florian Obser <florian+i...@narrans.de> wrote: > It occurred to me that a validating stub resolver still needs to know if > its upstream is messing with DNS. With RFC9606 we can just ask the > resolver what it's doing, so I put up > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fobser-resinfo-dns64/ > > A validating stub can then avoid that resolver or do more fancy things > like spotting that the resolver did DNS64 synthesis, ignore that answer > and do its own synthesis using the 8781 prefix...
Do you think it might be useful to explain those scenarios in the draft? Because an uneducated reader (like me) might wonder "why does the resolver need to know" and "what problem does this new feature solve?". P.S. Thank you for posting -01 and removing yet another way to discover the prefix ;) -- Cheers, Jen Linkova _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
