As I said in my immediately previous email, thanks for the support and I'm in complete agreement.
Steve On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 6:22 PM Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: > Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> writes: > > > I believe we must allow for this possibility in the 4 columns even > > when we may wish it won't be used. > > Following myself, because I forgot my ending opinion: > > 1. I think that the current 8624bis document should not be combined with > the phasing document, for the reasons I laid out. I believe the 8624bis > document is functionally "done" and should be published. > > 2. I think the WG should consider adopting the phasing document, and > that document should make use of the columns from 8624bis (it already > does this). Thus, 8624bis is a base for the phasing document. > > -- > Wes Hardaker > USC/ISI > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org > -- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
