Tim:
>
> As a chair, the current draft appears to require seven RFCs for the lifecycle
> of an algorithm.
> I agree with Paul W that the WG should spend their time on other documents,
> but am happy to be proven wrong.
This draft does not require any RFCs. It says:
... The criteria associated
with the transition between phases of the lifecycle will depend on
the process that makes changes to the IANA registry as defined in
[I-D.ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis].
Russ
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
