Resent Shown a red card by DKIM
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Dick Franks <rwfra...@acm.org> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 15:04 Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Revised the application for the WALLET RRTYPE To: Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com>, <dnsop@ietf.org> Cc: Petr Špaček <pspa...@isc.org> On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 14:03, Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 8:19 AM Petr Špaček <pspa...@isc.org> wrote: > >> >> >8 >> >> I wonder if it needs some words how to handle wallet addresses longer >> than 255 characters? >> >> > I was wondering the same thing earlier, but forgot to chime in about it. > > Why should a new RR-type be constrained in this way? It should define its > RDATA components to be as large as they need to be. > > The length of the currency field is known, as is the RDATA length, so there is no need for any length constraint on the wallet address. The URI record (RFC7553) uses an unconstrained string, so this is nothing new. --rwf > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
