On Thu, Jun 20 2024 at 1:30 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@cloudflare.com> wrote:
> Hi Warren, > > On Jun 20, 2024, at 18:56, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > > Hi there Authors, IESG, WG and Secretariat, > > draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one - "In the DNS, QDCOUNT is (usually) One" > is now approved. > > I'd like to thank everyone, especially the authors and Eric Vyncke, for > all of their hard work - it significantly improved the document. > > There are some editorial comments that can still be addressed; these are > minor enough that they can occur with the RFC Editor… > > I have tackled the editorial comments in a candidate 04 (not submitted, > URL below, work-in-progress-in-progress). > Awesome, thank you, Joe. W Since these changes are minor and don't affect the substance of the > document I presumed to tackle these without bothering Ray, so any glaring > errors in this candidate 04 are mine, not his. If anybody feels like > checking my work, it can be found at: > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one > > The one comment I didn't address was Éric's comment on section 1, where we > use (as in this sentence) the editorial "we" to outline the structure of > the document to follow. I think the editorial "we" is sufficiently familiar > from its use elsewhere (e.g. in many, many academic papers) that the > context is clear, and I think the passive voice would make that paragraph > harder to read, so I didn't change it. Of course if this seems > unsatisfactory we can revisit it^W^W^W^Wit can be revisited. > > Joe >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
