I am supporting the publication of this document. Yours, Daniel
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:32 AM Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour= 40cira...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Yes, agree, we should publish. > > 4.3 *The Parental Agent receives a new or updated NS record set for a > Child;* > 4.3 *Any other condition as deemed appropriate by local policy.* > > -> to confirm my understanding, as a registry operator, a trigger could > be when a domain is new/being registered, and add the DS record at creation > when bootstrap information is legit, so that the domain is *created* on the > onset as a signed delegation. > > Jacques > > > > CLASSIFICATION:CONFIDENTIAL > -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of John Levine > Sent: January 21, 2024 9:41 AM > To: dnsop@ietf.org > Cc: tjw.i...@gmail.com > Subject: [EXT] Re: [DNSOP] Followup Working Group Last Call for > draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping > > It appears that Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> said: > >For WGLC, we need positive support and constructive comments; lack of > >objection is not enough. > >So if you think this draft should be published as an RFC, please say so. > > I think we should publish it, but I also think we should publish the > NOTIFY draft at the same time so we don't have yet another thing that > requires DNS scanning. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
