Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Donald Eastlake for his SECDIR review. Please review his proposed text on including clarifying language around the applicability of TSIG. I support Martin Duke and Rob Wilton’s DISCUSS positions. ** Section 7.2 This would indicate prior reliance upon IP fragmentation, which is universally considered to be harmful to both the performance and stability of applications, endpoints, and gateways. Is there a reference that can be cited to substantiate this “universal” position? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
