Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Comments ### S1 * "TCP avoids fragmentation by ..." TCP also benefits hugely from widespread support for MSS rewriting. If something like an "EDNS0 Payload Size rewriting" function was available and as widely deployed there might be a very different conversation to be had. No text changes necessary; just a random thought. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
