Op 17 sep. 2023 om 17:40 heeft Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> het 
volgende geschreven:

> The reason I'm asking, though, is that we had 7719 in 2015, which was 
> replaced by 8499 in 2019, and now this revision.  Since we consider RFCs 
> expensive to produce, I thought it was a reasonable question to ask.

I think it's a reasonable question. 

Keeping track of our terminology to the extent that there is appetite to do so 
with a document every four years sounds like success to me, though. If we 
couldn't manage that, I might suggest we were in trouble.


Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to