so some TLD don't. But also some ccTLD are using notation which probably doesn't matter much, but confuses me because it is wildcarded ONLY where other ccTLD put both the bare TLD and the wildcard (as noted before)
look, there's nothing to see here. my confusion is not an industry wide problem. ccTLD aside, ICANN has contract levers with gTLD and if there was reason to tweak the lever they would, and thats not "our" job. my concerns with the PSL governance aren't relevant either. I am sure it was purposeful. I don't have to like things for them to provide upsides. -G On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:30 PM Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > > > George Michaelson wrote on 2023-07-18 17:42: > > I know, I could submit these to the PSL website directly. I am asking > > a meta question: do we think that operationally, if a PSL exists, that > > all ccTLD and TLD should be on it? > > no. as we learned from delegation-only, some TLDs don't. > > i see ~36mil unique A RRsets in *.family passive dns, ~16mil unique AAAA > RRsets, and ~155kilo MX RRsets. > > far fewer in *.museum, but still, present. > > the PSL wasn't created without a reason. > > -- > P Vixie > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
