It appears that Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io> said:
>> It will require more process work (potentially blocking) to revise other
>> documents too.
>
>I checked before proposing it, and couldn't find anything that would need
>revision. RFC 1035 calls that type experimental, no
>NULL RRs allowed in zone file, and content opaque (if used on the wire). To
>me, that actually looks like a rather ideal set of
>pre-conditions.
RFC 6895 says:
RRTYPE zero is used as a special indicator for the
SIG(0) RR [RFC2931] [RFC4034] and in other
circumstances and must never be allocated for
ordinary use.
I suppose we can have a meta-discussion about whether this is an ordinary use,
but I would prefer not to.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
