It appears that Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io> said: >I suspect it is intentional, because there seems little value in jumping >through the NSEC3 extra hoops like hashing and >dealing with NSEC3PARAM when you don't get any of the benefit NSEC3 was >designed for. (Compact NSEC answers prevent zone >enumeration just as well, if not better.)
The introduction does mention NSEC3. It seems worth mentioning that if you can do compact answers, NSEC3 has little (no?) benefit. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
