On Feb 9, 2023, at 06:33, Willem Toorop <wil...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> 
> Op 07-02-2023 om 16:45 schreef Paul Wouters:> I find the valid use of the 
> name "invalid" to be pretty horrible. An
>> engineer looking at a catalog might quickly believe
>> the invalid is a bug where it should have shown a real domain. Why not 
>> _catalog.arpa or something ?
> 
> We, the co-authors, actually prefer producers to use a domain they own 
> (because no chance on collisions with consumers from multiple producers). 
> I've done a commit to express that more clearly. The new text is:
> 
>   ``It is RECOMMENDED to use a domain name owned by the catalog producer if 
> possible, or if that is not possible use a name under a suitable name such as 
> "invalid." [RFC6761].''

A name under a suitable name such as invalid would then be 
“example.com.invalid” and not as it has now just “invalid” ?

Or it could use “_catalog.example.com”  ?

Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to