Hi all, Thank you to the authors, chairs and WG for wanting to make the document as good as it can be, even if that does require some more work.
The chairs have requested that I return it to the WG to get an implementation section added, and so I'll do so[0]. Thanks again, W [0]: I'll keep the ballot text, cliffsnotes summary, review notes, etc all squirreled away somewhere so that it's easier and faster to progress when it returns to me / whoever the next OpsAD is... On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:46 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > The chairs thank all for this feedback, even at this stage. But it's > better to catch these issues now, than > later on in the process. > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 3:52 PM Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: > > I am indifferent about what label we stick on this, but perhaps the > document should have a section on implementations? > > However, I do feel that the Security Considerations is missing on the > risks of dropping packets, ICMP filtering and dangers of PMTUD. > > Also it feels weird to me that the IP_PMTUDISC_OMIT is used by: BIND 9, > NSD, Unbound, Knot DNS and PowerDNS, but neither the fact nor the reasoning > behind the option is ever mentioned here. > > Hence, I think the Implementors section should be added to the document. > > > an Implementation Section would be useful and generally they appear as an > Appendix. > > Ondrej, if you could suggest some text with what ISC will implement, along > with any reasoning, that would be a great start. > > tim > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
