> On 20 Jan 2023, at 15:20, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > Given the long list of things in this document that ISC has thought about and > actively decided not to do, is it a good idea that we call it a "best current > practice"?
Maybe. Though a BCP should go beyond documenting what BIND9 does. In many cases, what BIND9 does is the de facto BCP. However IMO a “real” BCP should include insights from other implementations and from operators. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
