Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08 CC @larseggert Thanks to Russ Housley for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/V-jMkADwNBpUN-H4TyNcC_RdTwg). ## Comments ### Section 3, paragraph 2 ``` Catalog consumers MUST ignore any RR in the catalog zone which is meaningless to or otherwise not supported by the implementation. ``` Russ Housley raised this in his Gen-ART review: What is meant by "meaningless" here? ### Too many authors The document has seven authors, which exceeds the recommended author limit. Has the sponsoring AD agreed that this is appropriate? ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Grammar/style #### "Table of Contents", paragraph 1 ``` tent of a DNS zone is synchronized amongst its primary and secondary nameserv ^^^^^^^ ``` Do not mix variants of the same word ("amongst" and "among") within a single text. #### Section 4.1, paragraph 3 ``` ord in the collection. <unique-N> has an unique value in the collection. When ^^ ``` Use "a" instead of "an" if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. "a sentence", "a university". #### Section 5.1, paragraph 7 ``` dure described in Section 4.4.1. Otherwise a migration of a member zone from ^^^^^^^^^ ``` A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb "Otherwise". #### Section 5.2, paragraph 2 ``` yet (because of a lost packet or down time or otherwise), but did already se ^^^^^^^^^ ``` This word is normally spelled as one. Did you mean "downtime"? #### Section 6, paragraph 1 ``` to enumerate the contents of a multi-valued property (such as the list of m ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` This word is normally spelled as one. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
