Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not sure how I feel about this being a BCP. If it's more of an index to other DNSSEC standards documents, shouldn't it be Informational? If the core documents are Standards Track, doesn't that mean DNSSEC is a (proposed) standard, not a BCP? Can it be both? If we ever promote the core documents to full standard, what becomes of this document's status? Maybe there are some precedents here I don't know about. I'm happy to be guided if there's history I'm missing. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
